External validation of the 2017 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for inflammatory myopathies in a Mexican cohort: Role of autoantibodies in the diagnosis and classification of patients with inflammatory myopathies.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study aimed to perform the first external validation of the ACR/EULAR classification criteria for inflammatory myopathy (IIM) in a Mexican dynamic cohort where the patients were evaluated with clinical and laboratory values. As secondary objectives, we presented the clinical characteristics of the patients and included antibodies other than anti Jo1 to evaluate their impact on our population. METHODOLOGY: This study included 70 patients with IIM and 70 patients with differential diagnoses of IIM, according to the absolute score of the classification criteria. We obtained sensitivity and specificity in the modality without biopsy, and as an exploratory analysis, we added other antibodies from the myositis extended panel. We analyzed the area under the curve (AUC) of three models: score without antibodies, with anti Jo1 and with any antibody. RESULTS: The ACR/EULAR criteria showed increased specificity and at least similar sensitivity to that of the original cohort (85% sensitivity and 92% specificity), with a cohort point of >55%. When we classified patients into definite, probable, possible, and no IIM categories, by adding the extended myopathy panel, 6 of the 10 patients initially classified as "no IIM" changed their classification to "Probable IIM" and 4 to "Definite IIM"; of the 16 patients classified as "probable IIM," 15 changed their classification to "Definite IIM." CONCLUSION: Considering the limitations of this study, we concluded that the 2017 EULAR/ACR criteria for IIM classification are sensitive and specific for classifying patients with IIM in the Mexican population. Additionally, the addition of antibodies other than anti-Jo1 may improve performance in certain populations.

External validation of the 2017 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for inflammatory myopathies in a Mexican cohort: Role of autoantibodies in the diagnosis and classification of patients with inflammatory myopathies / Validación externa de los criterios de clasificación de la ACR/EULAR de 2017 para miopatías inflamatorias en una cohorte mexicana. Papel de los anticuerpos en el diagnóstico y la clasificación de pacientes con miopatías inflamatorias

Objective: This retrospective study aimed to perform the first external validation of the ACR/EULAR classification criteria for inflammatory myopathy (IIM) in a Mexican dynamic cohort where the patients were evaluated with clinical and laboratory values. As secondary objectives, we presented the clinical characteristics of the patients and included antibodies other than anti Jo1 to evaluate their impact on our population. Methodology: This study included 70 patients with IIM and 70 patients with differential diagnoses of IIM, according to the absolute score of the classification criteria. We obtained sensitivity and specificity in the modality without biopsy, and as an exploratory analysis, we added other antibodies from the myositis extended panel. We analyzed the area under the curve (AUC) of three models: score without antibodies, with anti Jo1 and with any antibody. Results: The ACR/EULAR criteria showed increased specificity and at least similar sensitivity to that of the original cohort (85% sensitivity and 92% specificity), with a cohort point of >55%. When we classified patients into definite, probable, possible, and no IIM categories, by adding the extended myopathy panel, 6 of the 10 patients initially classified as “no IIM” changed their classification to “Probable IIM” and 4 to “Definite IIM”; of the 16 patients classified as “probable IIM,” 15 changed their classification to “Definite IIM.” Conclusion: Considering the limitations of this study, we concluded that the 2017 EULAR/ACR criteria for IIM classification are sensitive and specific for classifying patients with IIM in the Mexican population. Additionally, the addition of antibodies other than anti-Jo1 may improve performance in certain populations.(AU)

Objetivo: Este estudio retrospectivo tuvo como objetivo realizar la primera validación externa de los criterios de clasificación ACR/EULAR para miopatía inflamatoria (MII) en una cohorte dinámica de pacientes mexicanos que fueron evaluados en consulta y con muestras de laboratorio. Como objetivos secundarios presentamos las características clínicas de los pacientes e incluimos anticuerpos distintos al anti-Jo1 para evaluar su impacto en nuestra población. Metodología: Este estudio incluyó a 70 pacientes con MII y 70 pacientes con diagnóstico diferencial de MII, según la puntuación absoluta de los criterios de clasificación. Obtuvimos la sensibilidad y la especificidad en la modalidad sin biopsia, y como análisis exploratorio añadimos otros anticuerpos del panel extendido de miositis. Analizamos el área bajo la curva (AUC) de tres modelos: puntuación sin anticuerpos, con anti-Jo1 y con cualquier otro anticuerpo. Resultados: Los criterios ACR/EULAR mostraron una mayor especificidad y una sensibilidad, al menos similar a la de la cohorte original (85% de sensibilidad y 92% de especificidad), con un punto de cohorte de >55%. Cuando clasificamos a los pacientes en las categorías de definitiva, probable, posible y sin MII, al agregar el panel ampliado de miopatía, 6 de los 10 pacientes clasificados inicialmente como «Sin MII» cambiaron su clasificación a «Probable MII» y 4 a «MII Definitiva»; de los 16 pacientes clasificados como «Probable MII», 15 cambiaron su clasificación a «MII Definitiva». Conclusión: Considerando las limitaciones de este estudio, concluimos que los criterios de 2017 de la EULAR/ACR para la clasificación de la MII son sensibles y específicos para clasificar a los pacientes con MII en la población mexicana. Además, la adición de anticuerpos que no sean anti-Jo1 puede mejorar la estadificación en ciertas poblaciones.(AU)

Problems related to sexuality are relevant but not addressed in rheumatology practice: results from a cross-sectional survey.

Sexual issues have a high prevalence in people with rheumatic diseases, but they are not commonly discussed in clinical practice, so we aim to determine the relevance and frequency of addressing problems related to sexuality in Rheumatology clinical practice in Mexico. We obtained data from an electronic survey applied to Mexican physicians involved in Rheumatology practice. The questionnaire was adapted from a previous study. The responses were analyzed and presented with descriptive statistics. We received 75 responses, 52% were from women, with an average age of 35.5 years. Sixty-two (82.6%) participants considered problems related to sexuality as quite relevant to Rheumatology practice, but a lower proportion (10, 13.3%) approach them to the same extent. The main barriers to the management of sexual issues that we recognized were the patient's embarrassment, patient´s age, and time. Most of our participants (62.7%) considered the rheumatologist as responsible for initiating the dialogue about sexual issues. Mexican rheumatologists consider sexual issues as relevant. Further training in sexuality is warranted for health care professionals attending people with rheumatic diseases.